Ontario court of justice judges

One of the most common mistakes made by Toronto criminal defence lawyers is not being proactive out of the gate. Sometimes this is almost 2 months after charges are laid; often they find that they have waited too long. Instead, criminal lawyers from Toronto Robb and his colleagues know that there is no time to waste. In some cases, helpful evidence and key witnesses can only be located in the days immediately after an arrest is made. By hiring investigators when necessary and taking immediate steps to retrieve helpful evidence, Robb and his team put themselves in a position to explore all possible leads, which may help the Defendant.

A bail hearing is the first step an Accused must take on the Road to Freedom. After an Accused deals with his bail hearing, it can be many months before an Accused is brought to trial. Criminal proceedings are prosecuted by government lawyers who represent either the Federal or the Provincial Crown Attorney. The resources of both federal and provincial prosecutors are vast.

Robb knows that a criminal defence lawyer must be at the top of his game to shield clients from undue harm and to ensure their rights are upheld. In many cases, careful negotiation and planning at the outset can result in charges being withdrawn against an Accused.

He does so with confidence. After the bail hearing, accused parties are either detained in custody or released pending trial. Trial dates are typically set 8 months to a year after bail is addressed. If a client is detained in custody, he will typically be able to receive a faster trial date. After bail is addressed, a Defendant will be asked to come back to court in 4 to 6 weeks time. If a Defendant retains a lawyer prior to his first appearance, the lawyer can attend the first appearance on behalf of the Defendant.

Sometimes these negotiations involve changing or relaxing bail conditions. Sometimes Defence counsel are able to receive very favourable positions from the Crown Attorney at this Stage of the Process.

Diversion may require the Accused to complete community service hours or pay back monies to a complainant. It is crucial that the Defence attorney is well prepared for the Crown Pretrial. Occasionally, they are held in court.

Oops: The curious case of the wrong judge

The JPT allows the defence lawyer to discuss and negotiate the case with the Crown Attorney while receiving input from a Judge. In these circumstances, the Judge may agree to accept the proposal ie. Top defence lawyers recognize JPTs as an opportunity for useful negotiation. If cases are unable to settle at the end of one or more JPTs, the case will proceed to trial.

A trial finally provides the Accused with an opportunity to formally deny or challenge the allegations against him. However, if an Accused takes a matter all the way to trial and loses, the Crown will seek a punishment or sentence that is far more severe than what would have been offered to the Accused, had he plead guilty on an earlier date.

Trials present an opportunity for huge rewards if the defence is successful, and severe punishments if the defence fails. A wise Defendant will only go to trial with a confident and capable defence lawyer representing him.

Crown witnesses may lie or hide evidence. It takes a skilled cross-examination to uncover these details. Skilled lawyers will also decide which, if any, evidence should be lead at trial on behalf of the Defendant. I would like to thank Mr.The Tribunal shall consist of no more than six full-time members; or any number of part-time members, or combination of full-time and part-time members, so long as the combined time devoted to their functions and duties does not exceed the combined time that would be devoted by six full-time members.

The Governor in Council shall establish a roster of six to eighteen superior court judges to act as members of the Tribunal. The Chairperson and other members may be appointed from the roster by the Governor desi tech app Council. Each member shall be appointed for a term not exceeding five years and holds office so long as he or she remains a superior court judge.

Each member, on the expiry of the first term of office, is eligible to be reappointed for one further term. A judge who has ceased to be a member for any reason other than removal may, with the authorization of the Chairperson, complete any outstanding functions or duties within a period of days after ceasing to be a member.

Justice Chiappetta was born in Sault Ste. From toJustice Chiappetta served a number of legal firms across Ontario. Her main areas of practice were corporate law, civil litigation, environmental law, labour law, and human rights.

As a member of the Superior Court, Justice Chiappetta has a breadth of experience adjudicating in civil, family, and commercial courts. Her most recent position was overseeing commercial list matters.

Three new Ontario Court of Justice judges for Ottawa

Justice Chiappetta has been a Deputy Judge of the Nunavut Court of Justice since Decemberwhere she has assisted the territory and its history of judicial excellence. On June 22,Justice Chiappetta was appointed as a full-time member of the Specific Claims Tribunal for a term of five years. On December 11,she was appointed Chairperson for a term of five years.

He was appointed to the Specific Claims Tribunal for a term of two years on May 18, He was re-appointed to the Specific Claims Tribunal, as a part-time member, for a term beginning on May 18, and ending on September 5, He graduated with a B.

He became a partner in He specialized in real estate law. He taught a course on commercial leases at the faculties of law of University of Montreal and McGill University He was also the chairman of the Board of the real estate brokerage indemnity fund from to The Mayer Report on this topic was published in June He continued to act in this matter until his appointment to the bench. He was re-appointed to the Specific Claims Tribunal, as a part-time member, for a five year term beginning on May 18, and ending on May 18, Justice Todd Ducharme has a B.

Prior to his appointment as a judge, he was a criminal lawyer doing primarily defence work. He also worked as a standing agent for the Attorney General of Canada, conducting prosecutions under various federal statutes, and was as well the first Clinic Director of Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto. He served as a bencher of the Law Society of Upper Canada for six years and was active in numerous other professional organizations. On April 13,Justice Ducharme was appointed to the Specific Claims Tribunal as a part-time member for a term of five years.

She practiced as a lawyer in various law firms, and at the time of her appointment to the bench, she was a partner at Gowling, Lafleur, Henderson LLP.

Justice Mainville has an extensive background in aboriginal, constitutional and administrative law. Throughout her career as a lawyer, she was involved in numerous matters involving aboriginal and treaty rights. She also led important litigation involving aboriginal peoples and concerning the implementation of land claims agreements, environmental and social impact processes and constitutional issues. Her appointment with the Tribunal expired on December 19, He has extensive experience in criminal and complex civil litigation with a special interest in alternate dispute resolution and mediation.

He has been extensively involved for several years in the education of lawyers and judges, is a member of the Superior Court of Ontario Judicial Education Committee, a faculty member of the National Judicial Institute and past instructor at the Ontario Bar Admission Programme.

In nearly 25 years of practice, Justice Geoffroy specialized in civil law, property law, corporate law, commercial law, insurance law and aboriginal law litigation. He was appointed to the Superior Court of Quebec on February 20,Race trumps knowledge when it comes to training new teachers, an Ontario court has determined.

They found an oblique, and ultimately successful, way to overturn the test. Black and Indigenous students were particularly affected, the Divisional Court was told. Apparently the discrimination and disadvantages only manifests itself in the understanding of math, and even then only for some.

The results of the first math test show that The pass rate for white candidates was As a result of the decision, not only do non-white students no longer have to pass the math test, no one does. The court threw it out. The Ontario government has not yet said whether it will appeal. The judges were not altogether opposed to teachers having to know something about math.

Putting on their public policy hats, they suggested that perhaps a mandatory math course during the teacher training program would be a reasonable substitute. Curiously, they reasoned that a math course would not work against racialized students, but a math test would. The details of this ruling deserve a place in the Woke Justice Hall of Fame, but it is the larger themes that are important. Once again, Ontario teachers are going to great lengths to assert that they, not the duly elected government, should call the shots in education.

Where does that line of reasoning end? What if a would-be teacher was unable to pass the teacher training course? The Ontario math test decision is where we end up when race becomes more important than demonstrated competence.

Contact him at randalldenley1 gmail. Sustainability is set to be an increasingly prominent theme in beauty and skincare inaccording to industry insiders.

From the B. Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again. This website uses cookies to personalize your content including adsand allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Holiday Sale! Most wonderful time of the year! Holiday print and online access subscription savings. Get holiday deals on print and online subscriptions! Subscribe now. Manage Print Subscription. Main Menu Search nationalpost. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load. Try refreshing your browser, or tap here to see other videos from our team. Shopping essentials.Judicial Internships provide a unique opportunity to better understand the work of the courts, learn from observing and critically reflecting on legal advocacy, and refine legal research and writing skills under the direct supervision of a Judge.

Students interested in future Clerkship opportunities are highly encouraged to consider a Judicial Internship. Please see information on each placement site, below, including who to contact should more information be required.

Applications are collected in the summer for the Fall term and in early Fall for the Winter term. Students will be notified of the application details via email. Required documents include cover letter setting out the student's reasons for seeking an internship and the qualities and experience the student possesses that make them suited for the position.

A resume, transcript an unofficial transcript will sufficeand writing sample must also be provided. Students apply for their preferred Judicial Internship placement and have the opportunity to provide any further information that supports their application. The applications will be assessed in consultation with the Supervising Judges. View the Applicant Rubric. Students might be required to enrol in other Law courses before confirming a Judicial Internship placement.

Students are therefore encouraged to enrol in all courses besides the Judicial Internship. If students secure a Judicial Internship placement, they will be given permission and instructions to enrol in the proper course.

Students will receive three 3 credits for their work. Assessment is based on the student's professionalism and contributions to the work of the Court, including in the form of preparing research memoranda.

Assessment will be made by the Supervising Judge, in consultation with the Externship Program Director. Anti-requisite Practice Exception Form. Court Etiquette and Procedures. Withdrawal Policy. Travel Fund Application. UWin Letter to Placement Employers.Office Information Telephone:Ext. Monday — Tuesday - Wednesday — Thursday — Friday — Arraignment Court is held the 1st Wednesday of the month and the 4th Tuesday of the month starting at PM until finish.

Justice Courts have a very broad, yet limited, jurisdiction in matters affecting the local community. It is for this reason that Justice Courts are often called, "the courts closest to the people," and readily accessible geographically to the citizens.

Local courts handle the largest number of cases coming before the state's court system, and contribute greatly to State and local government. The New York State Legislature is presently considering increasing this amount. New York Town and Village Courts have criminal jurisdiction over all misdemeanors, violations, and infractions, together with arraignment and preliminary jurisdiction over felonies. The most common laws or types of cases that come before the court are listed below.

Jury trials are conducted when required by law. Home Departments Town Court. Copy and paste this code into your website. Share this page on your favorite Social network Facebook.Jr dragster cost Canadian Press Staff.

Osgoode Hall is seen in Toronto on Wednesday, Sept. Attorney General Doug Downey said part of the funding will help pay for more than new court employees, including Crown prosecutors, victim support staff and bail vettors -- experienced Crown attorneys who facilitate faster bail decisions and resolutions when appropriate.

The additional staff will help boost trial capacity and reduce the number of cases coming into the justice system, as well as speed up cases already in the system, he said. The bail vettors program, for example, ensures someone with experience has looked at a file before it comes to court and an appropriate resolution is set when it gets there, which frees up resources further down the line, the attorney general said.

The province has 10 and plans to increase that to Downey said the province will also convene a team of experienced prosecutors to review files involving homicides and other targeted offences to help streamline those cases.

The province is also renting space in some areas to boost physical capacity, and plans to continue using technology for remote hearings and build on other processes to help handle cases virtually, such as a digital evidence management program.

The attorney general said he wants to ensure charges related to crimes such as murder and sexual assault aren't being stayed due to delays in the judicial system. A Supreme Court of Canada ruling in established a maximum timeframe for cases to go to trial, after which defendants can apply for a stay of proceedings on grounds of unreasonable delay. The Jordan decision requires cases in provincial court to be heard within 18 months and those in superior court to be heard within 30, unless the court agrees there were extenuating circumstances.

Downey said the funding should allow the backlog to return to what it was in bybut stressed that isn't the end goal. So I'm a little more ambitious than just getting back to a level that we were at," he said. In-person court proceedings were suspended in the first few months of the COVID pandemic, with only urgent matters moving forward remotely. Public health restrictions have made it so that very few jury trials were heard during the pandemic.

An updated directive to Crown attorneys that took effect earlier this month instructed them to weigh whether prosecution is "viable and appropriate" and in the public interest given the impact of COVID on the justice system.

Common menu bar links

It also directed prosecutors to consider all available and appropriate sanctions to resolve cases as quickly as possible, and to "make every effort possible" to minimize delays caused by the pandemic in order to reduce the risk of cases being stayed. Ontario delaying return to school until Jan. Ontario introduces shortened isolation periods, new testing guidelines.

Ontario reducing capacity limits at large spectator venues to 1, people. Everything you need to know to book your booster dose appointment in Ontario. Reddit Share. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. Toronto Top Stories.This article was published more than 1 year ago. Some information may no longer be current. In an interview with The Globe and 3cx rest api documentation, Mr.

Downey, seen here at Queen's Park on June 20,said the proposed changes are meant to address delays in the justice system by speeding up the appointment process, and lead to more transparency in judicial selections and more diversity in courts. Ontario Attorney-General Doug Downey is moving ahead with changes to the way the province appoints judges and justices of the peace, generating praise in some parts of the legal community, but raising concerns about the potential for political interference.

Downey announced the changes on Thursday, backing off some of the more controversial proposals the Progressive Conservative government had initially floated, such as the idea of having the committee that reviews candidates for judicial appointments reconsider those it initially deemed not qualified.

But he is forging ahead with changes that would increase to six from two the number of candidates for an appointment the committee sends to the attorney-general, and require the committee to include a list of all the candidates it considered eligible.

Downey said the proposed changes are meant to address delays in the justice system by speeding up the appointment process, and lead to more transparency in judicial selections and more diversity in courts. The draft proposals, released on Thursday, will be put forward in legislation, Mr. Downey said. The province had consulted widely with law organizations and others on the updates. The Law Society of Ontario praised Mr.

But Hamilton civil-litigation lawyer Mike Winward, chair of the Federation of Ontario Law Associations FOLAsaid providing an expanded list of recommended candidates to the attorney-general could be problematic.

Peter Russell, the professor emeritus of political science at the University of Toronto, who designed the current process, adopted in the late s, agreed. Ontario names judges and justices of the peace to the Ontario Court of Justice, which handles criminal matters, traffic tickets, bail and offences under provincial acts.

The changes would require the judicial appointments advisory committee, which screens hundreds of applicants for judicial posts, to recommend to the attorney-general a minimum of six candidates. The attorney-general then brings one name to cabinet. Downey told The Globe. The committee would now also provide its full list of candidates it classified as recommended or highly recommended.

Some in the legal community said they feared the government could use this to find someone who agrees with its political views. The new system would allow the attorney-general to see all the recommended candidates. Downey said the qualifications to become a judge or justice of the peace will not change, and he will still not be able to see who the committee deems not recommended.

Asked how he would ensure independence of the judiciary, Mr. The changes would also cut the Justices of the Peace appointments advisory committee from 63 to 38 members, making it more efficient, Mr. Currently, three professional law groups directly name one lawyer each to the judicial appointments committee. Under the new system, the attorney-general would car clipart to approve their choices.

Currently, the attorney-general appoints seven of the 13 members. Two of the remaining three are named by the chief justice of the Ontario Court of Justice and the last is a member of the Ontario Judicial Council. Winward of FOLA, one of the groups that currently appoints a lawyer to the committee, said the move would allow the government to exert further control. Sign up today. Report an error.

Our Services

Editorial code of conduct. Skip to main content. Laura Stone Queen's Park Reporter. Bookmark Please log in to bookmark this story. Log In Create Free Account. Associate Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice and Co-ordinator of Justices of the Peace. The Honourable Lise S. Parent. Judges of the Court deal with a wide range of family law cases (including. Ontario is divided into seven geographic regions for judicial administration: northwest, northeast, west, central west. Justice, Mary Lou Benotto · 8 November ; Justice, Steve A.

Coroza · 6 April ; Justice, David H. Doherty, 1 September ; Justice. Attorney General Doug Downey announced the appointment of six judges to the Ontario Court of Justice, effective December 30, Attorney General Doug Downey announced the appointment of three justices to the Ontario Court of Justice, effective November 18, The Chief Justice, the two Associate Chief Justices, and approximately judges and justices of the peace make up the Ontario Court of Justice.

It is. 12 The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and of the Superior Court of Justice in and for the. The Council may also review and approve standards of conduct established by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice; approve continuing education.

“A strong and independent judiciary is indispensable to the proper administration of justice in our society. Judges must be free to perform their judicial. (3) There shall be such additional offices of judge of the Court of Appeal as are from time to time required, to be held by Chief Justices of Ontario and. Attorney General Doug Downey has announced the appointment of three justices to the Ontario Court of Justice, effective Nov. Today Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada announced the following judicial appointments in the province of Ontario.

weika.eu Andrew Pinto was appointed a judge of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in February Previously, Andrew Pinto was a partner. Susan Vella, counsel at Rochon Genova LLP in Toronto, is appointed a Judge of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario. Madam Justice Vella. Judges Hon. Brian D. Dennis Hon. Frederick G. Reed Hon. Kristina A. Karle. The Ontario Court of Justice can hear family law cases involving the same types of issues as the Family Court - SCJ (Superior Court of Justice).

Presiding judges will determine whether any in-progress jury trials will continue. Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Commercial List. Associate Chief Justice (Family Court) of the Superior Court of Justice.

Chief Judge of the Ontario Court (Provincial Division). Chief Justice of the. Visit the Department of Justice Website for the latest judicial appointments. Canada. Court, Total Number of Judges in Office, Super- numeraries, Grand Total.